The Scarcity of Open-Source Libraries for Mitsubishi PLC MC Protocol, SLMP, and CC-Link

Ever wondered why open-source is booming in Information Technology (IT) but remains a rare sight in the industrial Operational Technology (OT) landscape? Our latest analysis, drawing from the “The Scarcity of Open-Source Libraries” report, unpacks this significant divide, especially concerning proprietary Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) protocols from industry giants like Mitsubishi Electric.

While a staggering 95% of IT leaders report open-source as “strategically important,” less than 1% of core industrial PLC protocols, such as Mitsubishi Electric’s MC Protocol, SLMP, and CC-Link, are truly open-source. This isn’t accidental; it’s a deeply entrenched paradigm.

Key Reasons for the Divide (The Five Core Barriers):

Vendor Business Models:The strongest barrier. Manufacturers protect their intellectual property and rely on proprietary systems for revenue and control.
Safety & Certification: Critical in industrial environments. Open-source solutions often lack the rigorous, validated certification required for mission-critical applications.
IP & Legal Risks: Concerns around intellectual property infringement and liability are heightened in industrial settings.
Niche Market Dynamics: The industrial automation market is smaller and highly specialized compared to general IT, leading to less collective effort for open-source development.
Technical Complexity: While present, this is often a lesser barrier than the commercial and regulatory challenges.

Industrial Market Priorities: A Different Value System

Unlike IT’s focus on speed and flexibility, the industrial sector prioritizes:

Reliability & Stability (45%): Systems must run continuously and predictably.
Long-Term Vendor Support (30%): Assured support over decades is non-negotiable.
Certified Safety (20%): Compliance with stringent safety standards is paramount.
Cost & Openness (5%): These factors, while important, are secondary to operational integrity.

The Ripple Effect: Challenges for System Integrators

The dominance of these proprietary protocols creates a direct chain of challenges for integrators and developers:

Increased Development Costs: necessitating licensed SDKs and custom drivers.
Severe Vendor Lock-In: making companies reliant on single-vendor tools and libraries.
Limited Interoperability: causing difficulties in integrating multi-vendor systems.

Future Outlook: A Slow Thaw

While the vast installed base of “brownfield” sites means proprietary protocols will likely dominate core machine control for decades (projected 76% by 2030), open standards like OPC UA are steadily gaining traction for connecting factory floors to enterprise systems (projected 24% by 2030).

What are your experiences with proprietary vs. open-source in industrial settings? How can we best navigate this “divide” to foster more innovation and flexibility without compromising on safety and reliability?

M	T	W	T	F	S	S
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30

Bufferstack.IO®

Connecting Things on Network

The Scarcity of Open-Source Libraries for Mitsubishi PLC MC Protocol, SLMP, and CC-Link

Post your Comments

Previous Posts

RSS Feed

Latest from Bufferstack.IO